Skip to main content

by Salma Ismaiel, Michael Crosby, Harris Beringer, and the Leadership Connect Data Science Team
November 2021

KEY FINDINGS

  • Agency: DoD is close to 80% of AI spend, with the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) taking the biggest slice of the pie.
  • Vendors: The majority of awards are going to traditional System Integrators (almost 50%).
  • Congressional: Most sponsors on bills impacting AI are not part of specific committee or caucuses involved in AI.

For Government

We identify the offices and staff who are using AI today to act as subject-matter experts for policy makers and agency leaders contemplating the use of AI technology. 

For Contractors

We provide a roadmap of every office and their staff involved in AI purchasing.   

For AI Vendors not working with the Federal Government

We identify who to talk to within government, and current contractors to approach for partnership.

In his remarks to the UN on Sept. 21, 2021, President Biden cited the need for partnerships with democratic countries to leverage AI to solve problems and advance human freedom.  Administration initiatives such as AI.gov, the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource Task Force and National Security Commission on AI demonstrate the increasing focus on AI.

We look at the past 5 years of spend and show who is involved in each contract.

Overview of AI Spending by Agency

As the largest purchaser of technology within the federal government, it should be no surprise the DoD is close to 80% of AI spend. Offices such as the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC) are critical to AI decision-making at the DoD. What may be surprising is the breadth of other agencies involved. Commerce, DHS, NASA, HHS, VA, and State are key players among the 20 other agencies who have AI-driven spend.

Chart of Agencies Involved in AI

Agency

Spend

Department of Defense $969,668,551
Department of Commerce $48,340,431
Department of Homeland Security $44,359,945
National Aeronautics and Space Administration $33,674,720
Health and Human Services $30,188,962
Department of Veterans Affairs $18,688,296
Department of State $6,975,680
Department of Transportation $6,386,409
Department of the Treasury $3,309,956
Department of Agriculture $2,043,843
Department of Energy $1,487,246
National Science Foundation $534,261
Executive Office of the President $405,330
Social Security Administration $314,910
Department of Labor $284,469
Government Accountability Office $253,265
Department of the Interior $245,538
Federal Reserve System $193,489
Environmental Protection Agency $177,337
Securities and Exchange Commission $116,317
Office of Personnel Management $103,360
Department of Justice $66,021

Overview of AI Spending by Office

Looking at the Agency level is great for a high-level view, but if you want to talk to the decision-makers and staff, you need to be at the office level. In just the DoD, there are well over 1,000 key people involved in AI-focused decision-making. There are also over 100 individual offices directly spending on AI.

Click the image below to view an interactive visualization

Chart of Top 20 Offices Involved in AI (with leaders and staff for each office)

Subscription required to load office profiles

Agency

Office

Spend

Department of Defense DISA $271,278,359
Department of Defense WHS $193,841,752
Department of Defense Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security [OUSD-I&S] $102,579,976
Department of Defense Contract Management Office [CMO] $74,319,855
Department of Defense Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory [DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory] $65,972,928
Department of Defense Defense Technical Information Center [DTIC] $52,203,090
Department of Commerce Scientific and Technical Information Center [STIC] $42,443,693
Department of Defense Air Force Research Laboratory [AFRL] $29,549,593
Department of Defense Software Engineering Center [SEC] $25,427,596
Department of Homeland Security Air and Marine Operations Center [AMOC] $24,810,505
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Shared Services Center [NSSC] $22,633,257
Department of Veterans Affairs TAC $18,306,016
Department of Defense Defense Finance and Accounting Service Columbus (OH) $17,400,808
Department of Defense U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Command [CECOM] $13,484,872
Department of Defense Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division [NSWC IHD] $12,841,872
Department of Defense Program Executive Office Aviation [PEO Aviation] $12,777,420
Department of Defense Office of Naval Research [ONR] $10,613,126
Health and Human Services OCS $9,631,678
Department of Defense Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate [NVESD] $9,599,693
Department of Homeland Security Domestic Nuclear Detection Office [CWMD/DNDO] $9,138,315

Overview of AI Vendors

We identified over 200 vendors involved in AI awards with the federal government. These include AI-focused companies, research-focused companies and non-profits, System Integrators, and universities. The Biden Administration has committed funds to research so universities and research organizations should come as no surprise. However, what may be surprising is that the majority of awards are going to traditional System Integrators (almost 50%). Since sub-contracting data is not publicly available, there are likely more AI vendors “working” with the federal government.

The top 50 vendors, arranged by type

Click the image below to view an interactive visualization

Chart of AI Vendors not doing business with the Federal Government as a primary contractor (G2)

MATLAB
RapidMiner
Alteryx
Rstudio
Anaconda
Kraken
BigML
DataRobot
SAS Enterprise Miner
Civis
Eggplant
Theano

Chart of Top AI Vendors (G2)

AI & Machine Learning Operationalization Software
Algorithmia
InRule
Cortex Certifai
IBM Watson Studio
UbiOps
cnvrg.io
Conversational Intelligence Software
ServiceNow Now Platform
IBM Watson Assistant
ManyChat
Qualified
Verloop.io
Zendesk Support Suite
Appy Pie
Drift
Birdeye
Userlike
Conversocial
Ada
ultimate.ai
Conversica
e-bot7
Azure Text to Speech API
Microsoft Knowledge Exploration Service
Microsoft Bing Spell Check API
NLTK
Amazon Polly
Data Labeling Software
SuperAnnotate
V7
Appen
Amazon Sagemaker Ground Truth
Datasaur
Innotescus Video and Image Annotation Platform
Dataloop
Playment
CloudFactory
DefinedCrowd
Diffgram Training Data Software
Machine Learning Operationalization Software
MLOps
Neptune.ai
Seldon
Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms
Peltarion Platform
Google Cloud AI Platform
TIMi Suite
Azure Machine Learning Studio
IBM SPSS Modeler
Explorium
IBM Decision Optimization
Amazon SageMaker
H20
Dataiku DSS
Box Skills
Qubole
Google Cloud AutoML
KNIME Analytics Platform
FloydHub
Deep Cognition
Deepnote
Oracle Data Science Cloud Service
Domino
Dash
DataCanvas
IBM Cloud Park for Data
Peak.ai Abnormal Demand Response
H20 Driverless AI
Pecan
Stratifyd
Datagran
Infosys Nia
JADBio AutoML
Kortical
Open Text Magellan
PerceptiLabs
Analance Advanced Analytics
Appier AIXON
Artivatic
Ayasdi
C3 AI Suite
Cloudera Data Enigneering
DeepDetect
Synthetic Data Software
MDClone
YData
Deep Learning Software
Keras
TFLearn
IntSig OCR Solutions
OpenCV
Syte
Google Cloud Vision API
Express Scribe
Kaldi
Jasper
Microsoft Speaker Recognition API
Microsoft Bing Speech API
Amazon Rekognition
Machine Learning
Xilinx
scikit-learn
Personalizer
Google Cloud TPU
Amazon Personalize
machine-learning
Python
GoLearn
MLIib
Amazon Forecast
Weka
Kubeflow
XGBoost
Crab
Mahout
Annoy
Beeze
Vowpal Wabbit
Cloud Talent Solution
SHARK
ByteBridge
Dlib Machine Learning
Pattern
Recombee
Sparkling Water
SuperLearner
Azure Custom Decision Service
Figaro
Mixtend
PyTorch
Apache SAMOA
Commerce Cloud Einstein
Conjecture
Crossing Minds API

Congressional Leaders Shaping Policy & Legislation

AI is clearly a focus area for the administration, but who calls the shots on the Hill? You might think tech and academic centers would dominate policy-making, but that is not the case.

We put together a District Map of where those policy makers reside. Certainly, coastal states dominate, but it’s not all Silicon Valley, Silicon Alley, and other tech centers.

What is notable for policy makers is that the vast majority of sponsors on bills impacting AI are not part of specific committee or caucuses involved in AI.

Leaders and staff comprised a group close to 200 key influencers on the Hill.

Future Updates

As contracts are released and money is spent, we will be closely monitoring the impact of those dollars in AI. Understandably the market is fluid, and we want to be prepared for what the contracting world needs. Please feel free to submit updates or suggestions.

 

About Our Data

Leadership Connect is the first service to use human-driven research and AI to connect agency leaders & staff to awards and opportunities for government and contractors.  We are also the first to do the same for policy and staff.  We used our database to export awards driven by keyword, known offices, vendors, and NAICS codes to produce a list of awards.  This same search is available in our product.  We did the same in looking at AI-focused entities on the Hill along with legislation to produce a list of leaders who are involved in AI-policy.